Mick Fuller was commissioner when the NSW police cleared David Elliott of impersonating a police officer. Given the serious threat to public safety caused by the police clearing Elliott of wrongdoing, why didn’t Fuller take steps to ensure he was prosecuted?

 

A former NSW Police Sergeant and a former NSW Police Prosecutor have made serious accusations against Mick Fuller and of a cover up by Gladys Berejiklian. If the accusations are true then Fuller and Berejiklian should be held to account. If the accusations are false then the sergeant and prosecutor should be held to account for spreading malicious rumours.

 

In a report tabled in NSW parliament, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (LECC) outlined how Fuller breached conflict of interest rules, and reversed its earlier decision to clear him of any wrongdoing.

The LECC probe was triggered by an ABC investigation that revealed Mr Fuller failed to declare his racehorse shares while serving as the NSW Police commissioner between 2017 and January this year, and earlier as an assistant commissioner.

Why did the commission initially clear Fuller of wrongdoing? What penalties, if any, was Fuller subjected to for breaching conflict of interest rules?   Read article >

 

Greens senator David Shoebridge raised conflict-of-interest concerns about the dealings between Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw and former NSW police commissioner Mick Fuller, alleging that their personal relationship could jeopardise the criminal investigation into the PwC tax scandal.

Shoebridge said documents he received in response to a Senate order seeking all communications between the AFP commissioner and Fuller highlighted that Kershaw had five meetings with Fuller over a lucrative contract handed to PwC.   Read article >